🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban remains "an measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust research".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this international conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and its followers show that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.